Yena LogoYena.
Sourcing de CandidatosFind and engage candidates.EnrichAuto-fill verified data.CRMCandidate + client relationships.Portal do clienteShare shortlists live.
Certificado SOC 2 Tipo IConforme com o RGPD
Executive SearchAgências de RecrutamentoATS for In-House TeamsRecrutamento Interno
CRM de Recrutamento para AgênciasCRM para Agências de StaffingATS para Executive SearchATS para pequenas agências
Software de Recrutamento de TIRecrutamento IndustrialRecrutamento na SaúdeAssessoria Jurídica e FiscalRetalho e Comércio EletrónicoServiços FinanceirosCibersegurança
ComparaçõesBlogCentro de AjudaGuia de Melhores PráticasGuia ATS com CRMLinkedIn Recruiter vs ATS
Ferramentas GratuitasCalculadora ROI do ATSDiagnóstico de Ops de RecrutamentoParser de CV com IA GratuitoReformatador de CV com IA GratuitoKit de Ferramentas de Recrutamento
Preços
EntrarVer em 15 min

O seu stack de recrutamento, simplificado.

Produtos

  • Sourcing de Candidatos
  • Enrich
  • CRM
  • Portal do cliente
  • Preços
  • Descarregar Aplicação Desktop

Soluções

  • Executive Search
  • Agências de Recrutamento
  • ATS for In-House Teams
  • Recrutamento Interno

Casos de uso

  • ATS para pequenas agências
  • ATS para executive search

Recursos

  • Comparações
  • Centro de Ajuda
  • Blog
  • Guia de Melhores Práticas
  • Guia RGPD
  • GDPR Compliance Checklist
  • Guia ATS com CRM
  • ATS Cost Guide
  • LinkedIn Recruiter vs ATS
  • Retained vs Contingent Search
  • How to Start a Recruiting Agency
  • Recruiting Software Stack Guide
  • Best Cities for Executive Search

Ferramentas Gratuitas

  • Calculadora ROI do ATS
  • Diagnóstico de Ops de Recrutamento
  • Parser de CV com IA Gratuito
  • Reformatador de CV com IA Gratuito
  • Kit de Ferramentas de Recrutamento

Empresa

  • Sobre Nós
  • Contacto
  • Carreiras
  • Política de Privacidade
  • Termos de Serviço
  • Security
  • Data Processing Agreement
  • Cookie Policy

Comparar a Yena

vs Bullhorn·vs Greenhouse·vs Personio·vs Lever·vs Workable·vs SmartRecruiters·vs BambooHR·vs Vincere·vs Loxo·vs Manatal·vs iCIMS·vs Teamtailor·vs Recruit CRM·vs SAP SuccessFactors·vs JobAdder·vs Ashby·vs JazzHR·vs Recruitee·vs Softgarden·vs Crelate·vs Zoho Recruit·vs Traffit·vs Firefish·vs Recruiterflow·vs Recrur·vs Staffin·vs Teamdash
Riga, Letónia | Mazā Nometņu iela 31, LV-1002
[email protected]
© 2026 SIA "New Tech".
Y
W
Platform Comparison

Yena vs. Workable: Which handles candidate tracking better?.

Workable is a popular ATS for SMBs hiring for themselves.

Yena is AI-native and built for executive search firms, staffing agencies, and European recruiting teams.

CANDIDATE MODEL
Yena: Executive search firms and staffing agencies tracking thousands of candidates.
Workable: In-house HR generalists who need something better than email + Excel.
AI SOURCING
Yena: Chrome Extension:
Workable: Job Posting:
DACH / EU COMPLIANCE
Yena: Yena
Workable: Workable
Start 10-Day Free TrialBook a Comparison Demo →
AI-Native Enrichment1-Click LinkedIn ImportDACH Compliant

Two different takes on "candidate tracking"

Workable is designed as an all-in-one ATS for SMBs hiring employees directly. Yena is designed as an AI-native ATS + CRM for teams that sell recruiting services or run high-touch executive searches.

Two platforms built for different jobs.

W
Workable is usually chosen by:
  • SMBs and scale-ups that want to centralize job posting and applications.
  • In-house HR generalists who need something better than email + Excel.
  • Companies hiring for a single brand identity.
Yena is usually chosen by:
  • Executive search firms and staffing agencies tracking thousands of candidates.
  • VC/PE talent teams needing long-term relationship depth.
  • DACH-first recruiting organizations focused on compliance.

At a Glance.

DimensionYenaWorkable
Primary FocusExecutive Search, Agencies, VC/PEIn-house SMB/Mid-market
Candidate SourceLinkedIn Sourcing + EnrichmentJob Boards + Careers Page
Tracking ModelPerson-centric (CRM style)Job-centric (ATS style)
AI RoleCore: Ingestion & EnrichmentAdd-on: Screening features
Regional BiasDACH/EU-FirstUS/UK/Global SMB
Best FitAgencies & Search FirmsIn-house HR Teams

"Choose Workable if you’re an SMB hiring employees for your own company. Choose Yena if you track candidates as long-term assets across many searches, roles, and clients."

How each platform thinks about a candidate.

Workable: Job-Centric

The job is the center of the universe. Each candidate lives primarily in the context of a specific job application pipeline.

  • Great for clear, linear processes.
  • Optimized for inbound applicants.

Yena: Person-Centric

The person is the center. One rich profile linked to many roles, searches, and clients over time.

  • Designed for passive pipelines & re-use.
  • Submit one candidate to multiple clients easily.

"If the same CFO might appear in five different searches over three years, Yena’s person-centric tracking feels much more natural."

Sourcing & Data: Manual vs. AI-Native.

Yena

  • 01

    Chrome Extension:

    Sync LinkedIn profiles in one click. Auto-extracts & standardizes data.

  • 02

    AI Parsing:

    Every resume/profile is enriched with skills, titles, and normalized dates automatically.

  • 03

    Semantic Matching:

    Candidates are scored against jobs as part of the core workflow.

Workable

  • Job Posting: Focuses on syndication to job boards and careers pages.

  • Screening: Offers questionnaires and basic automation features.

  • AI Layer: AI features are often add-ons or separate from the core architecture.

"Yena is designed to eliminate manual LinkedIn copy-paste. Workable is designed to make posting jobs simple."

Agencies vs In-House HR

Yena

Handles multiple clients/companies natively. Tracks placements, fees, and submittal history per client. One candidate can be active in 5 different client pipelines.

Workable

Assumes one hiring organization. Supports departments but not true multi-client revenue tracking. Agency workflows require workarounds.

Compliance: DACH vs Global

Yena

Built for GDPR & German law. Works Council workflows, consent tracking, and EU data residency are default.

Workable

Provides GDPR features, but aimed at a broad global SMB base. Local nuances often need manual process design.

Which platform fits your situation best?.

Scenario A

Staffing Agency in Munich

10 recruiters, 20+ clients. Heavy LinkedIn sourcing.

Recommendation: Yena

Multi-client pipelines & DACH compliance are critical.

Scenario B

SaaS Startup in London

150 employees. Mostly inbound applicants from job boards.

Recommendation: Workable

Simple ATS with strong job board syndication works well.

Scenario C

VC Talent Team

3 recruiters running searches for portfolio companies.

Recommendation: Yena

Confidentiality & person-centric model required.

FAQ: Yena vs Workable

For small internal teams with LinkedIn-first sourcing and executive roles, yes. For very job-board-heavy, high-volume hourly hiring, Workable’s posting tools may be more convenient.

Yena focuses primarily on sourcing from LinkedIn, enrichment, and relationship pipelines. If most of your hiring is inbound job-board traffic, Workable may be more aligned; if your hiring is outbound, Yena shines.

Yes. Export candidates, jobs, and evaluations from Workable as CSV, then import into Yena via the migration tools while preserving relationships.

Yena. It includes multi-client structure, placements, and revenue tracking by design; Workable is aimed at single organizations hiring for themselves.

Both can be made compliant, but Yena’s architecture assumes DACH and EU constraints from the start, reducing process work.

Compare Yena against other platforms

Enterprise HR
Yena vs Greenhouse

Best for: Executive Search vs. Internal Hiring

In-House Talent
Yena vs Lever

Best for: Relationship pipelines vs. TRM

Use Case
Staffing Agencies

Specialized workflows for high volume.