Yena LogoYena.
Sourcing de CandidatosFind and engage candidates.EnrichAuto-fill verified data.CRMCandidate + client relationships.Portal do clienteShare shortlists live.
Certificado SOC 2 Tipo IConforme com o RGPD
Executive SearchAgências de RecrutamentoATS for In-House TeamsRecrutamento Interno
CRM de Recrutamento para AgênciasCRM para Agências de StaffingATS para Executive SearchATS para pequenas agências
Software de Recrutamento de TIRecrutamento IndustrialRecrutamento na SaúdeAssessoria Jurídica e FiscalRetalho e Comércio EletrónicoServiços FinanceirosCibersegurança
ComparaçõesBlogCentro de AjudaGuia de Melhores PráticasGuia ATS com CRMLinkedIn Recruiter vs ATS
Ferramentas GratuitasCalculadora ROI do ATSDiagnóstico de Ops de RecrutamentoParser de CV com IA GratuitoReformatador de CV com IA GratuitoKit de Ferramentas de Recrutamento
Preços
EntrarVer em 15 min

O seu stack de recrutamento, simplificado.

Produtos

  • Sourcing de Candidatos
  • Enrich
  • CRM
  • Portal do cliente
  • Preços
  • Descarregar Aplicação Desktop

Soluções

  • Executive Search
  • Agências de Recrutamento
  • ATS for In-House Teams
  • Recrutamento Interno

Casos de uso

  • ATS para pequenas agências
  • ATS para executive search

Recursos

  • Comparações
  • Centro de Ajuda
  • Blog
  • Guia de Melhores Práticas
  • Guia RGPD
  • GDPR Compliance Checklist
  • Guia ATS com CRM
  • ATS Cost Guide
  • LinkedIn Recruiter vs ATS
  • Retained vs Contingent Search
  • How to Start a Recruiting Agency
  • Recruiting Software Stack Guide
  • Best Cities for Executive Search

Ferramentas Gratuitas

  • Calculadora ROI do ATS
  • Diagnóstico de Ops de Recrutamento
  • Parser de CV com IA Gratuito
  • Reformatador de CV com IA Gratuito
  • Kit de Ferramentas de Recrutamento

Empresa

  • Sobre Nós
  • Contacto
  • Carreiras
  • Política de Privacidade
  • Termos de Serviço
  • Security
  • Data Processing Agreement
  • Cookie Policy

Comparar a Yena

vs Bullhorn·vs Greenhouse·vs Personio·vs Lever·vs Workable·vs SmartRecruiters·vs BambooHR·vs Vincere·vs Loxo·vs Manatal·vs iCIMS·vs Teamtailor·vs Recruit CRM·vs SAP SuccessFactors·vs JobAdder·vs Ashby·vs JazzHR·vs Recruitee·vs Softgarden·vs Crelate·vs Zoho Recruit·vs Traffit·vs Firefish·vs Recruiterflow·vs Recrur·vs Staffin·vs Teamdash
Riga, Letónia | Mazā Nometņu iela 31, LV-1002
[email protected]
© 2026 SIA "New Tech".
Y
Z
Platform Comparison 2026

Yena vs Zoho Recruit AI-native vs budget-friendly basics.

Zoho Recruit offers affordability ($25-75/user/month) but basic features.

Yena is AI-native—autonomous LinkedIn extraction with auto contact info, semantic matching (25-40% better accuracy), and executive search workflows worth the investment.

LINKEDIN EXTRACTION
Yena: One-click autonomous extraction
Zoho: None — manual data entry only
MATCHING ACCURACY
Yena: Semantic AI (25-40% better)
Zoho: Keyword search
EXECUTIVE SEARCH
Yena: Purpose-built workflows
Zoho: Generic ATS
Book 30-min DemoRead Zoho Recruit Alternative Guide →

Why we believe we're credible to write this

Zoho Recruit is an affordable cloud-based ATS for SMBs doing volume hiring. Yena is AI-native for executive search with autonomous automation. Zoho Recruit wins on affordability and Forever Free plan for startups. Yena wins on AI-native architecture, autonomous LinkedIn extraction, semantic matching (25-40% accuracy improvement), executive search workflows, and ROI through time savings (50-70 hours saved per recruiter in 10 weeks).

Feature-by-Feature Comparison.

CharacteristicYenaZoho Recruit
Primary Value PropositionAI-native automation: eliminate manual work, improve matching accuracyAffordability: basic ATS features at low cost
LinkedIn Integration AutonomousOne click → AI extracts profile + auto-navigates for verified email/phoneNoneNo LinkedIn extraction; manual data entry required
Time to Add One Candidate 15 secondsOne click → AI imports everything → done5-10 minutesManual field-by-field data entry from LinkedIn or resume
Weekly Time Saved 5-7 hoursPer recruiter: autonomous extraction + AI matchingMinimalNo automation; still requires 5-10 min per candidate
Time Value (10 weeks) 50-70 hoursAt €100-200/hour consultant rate = €5K-14K value saved every 10 weeksMinimalLow cost but no time savings; manual work remains constant
AI Architecture NativeEvery import runs through Google GeminiBasicAI matching only in Pro/Enterprise plans; not core architecture
Candidate Matching SemanticGemini reads CV → semantic scoring → 25-40% better accuracyKeywordBoolean keyword search (AI matching only in higher tiers)
Executive Search Workflows Purpose-BuiltConfidential searches, passive nurturing, multi-client managementGenericBasic ATS for volume hiring; not specialized for executive search
Data Enrichment AI-PoweredAuto-standardizes dates, skills, experience, detects duplicatesManualData entered exactly as you type; no AI enrichment
Setup Time 24 hoursCloud-native: sign up → install extension → recruit2-3 daysAccount setup, team config, workflow customization
Per-User Pricing N/AFlat team pricing (€3K-€20K/year)$25-$75$25 Standard, $50 Pro (with AI), $75 Enterprise
10-Person Team Cost €7K-€12K/year~€600-1,000/month with full AI automation$3K-$9K/year~$250-750/month (but no LinkedIn extraction, basic features)
ROI Consideration High50-70 hours saved per recruiter in 10 weeks = €5K-14K value at consultant ratesLow CostLowest initial cost but no time savings; manual work constant
G2 RatingNew platform (launching Q1 2025)4.4/5 (652 reviews)

Who usually chooses what?

Z

Zoho Recruit is chosen by...

  • Freelance recruiters or startups with zero budget (Forever Free plan)
  • SMB in-house teams doing volume hiring with basic needs
  • Organizations prioritizing low cost over AI automation
  • Companies already using Zoho ecosystem seeking integration
Y

Yena is chosen by...

  • Executive search consultants where time savings justify investment
  • Recruiters spending 5+ hours/week manually copying LinkedIn profiles
  • Agencies wanting AI semantic matching (not just keyword search)
  • Consultants prioritizing quality placements over budget pricing

When to choose each platform.

Choose Yena If...

  • Your consultant time is worth €100-200/hour (5-7 hours saved/week = €500-1,400/week)
  • You spend 5+ hours/week manually copying LinkedIn profiles
  • You want AI semantic matching (25-40% accuracy improvement)
  • Quality placements and time efficiency matter more than lowest cost
  • You want executive search workflows (confidential searches, multi-client)

Choose Zoho Recruit If...

  • —You're a freelancer or startup with zero budget (Forever Free)
  • —Low initial cost is more important than time savings
  • —Volume hiring with basic applicant tracking meets your needs
  • —Manual LinkedIn data entry (5-10 min per candidate) is acceptable
  • —You're already using Zoho ecosystem and need integration

Frequently Asked Questions

Zoho Recruit doesn't offer LinkedIn extraction—you manually enter candidate data. Yena's Chrome extension extracts complete profiles with one click, including autonomous contact info retrieval for 1st-degree connections.

Zoho Recruit prioritizes affordability ($25-75/user/month) with basic features. Yena prioritizes time savings: 5-7 hours/week saved per recruiter at €100-200/hour consultant rate = €500-1,400/week value. The investment pays for itself if your time is valuable.

Zoho Recruit offers AI candidate matching only in Pro/Enterprise plans ($50-75/user/month), not core architecture. Yena is AI-native—every import runs through Google Gemini for semantic matching (25-40% better accuracy).

Yena is purpose-built for executive search with confidential workflows, passive candidate nurturing, and multi-client management. Zoho Recruit offers generic ATS workflows designed for volume hiring.

Zoho Recruit's Forever Free plan is great for freelancers and startups with zero budget but includes no LinkedIn extraction, basic keyword search, and no AI matching. For professional executive search, the time savings from Yena's automation typically justify the investment.

Related Comparisons

AUTOMATION
Yena vs Recruitee

AI automation vs collaborative workflows

AI
Yena vs Vincere

AI-native vs manual workflows

IN-HOUSE
Yena vs Greenhouse

Compare for in-house teams