Yena LogoYena.
Sourcing de CandidatosFind and engage candidates.EnrichAuto-fill verified data.CRMCandidate + client relationships.Portal do clienteShare shortlists live.
Certificado SOC 2 Tipo IConforme com o RGPD
Executive SearchAgências de RecrutamentoATS for In-House TeamsRecrutamento Interno
CRM de Recrutamento para AgênciasCRM para Agências de StaffingATS para Executive SearchATS para pequenas agências
Software de Recrutamento de TIRecrutamento IndustrialRecrutamento na SaúdeAssessoria Jurídica e FiscalRetalho e Comércio EletrónicoServiços FinanceirosCibersegurança
ComparaçõesBlogCentro de AjudaGuia de Melhores PráticasGuia ATS com CRMLinkedIn Recruiter vs ATS
Ferramentas GratuitasCalculadora ROI do ATSDiagnóstico de Ops de RecrutamentoParser de CV com IA GratuitoReformatador de CV com IA GratuitoKit de Ferramentas de Recrutamento
Preços
EntrarVer em 15 min

O seu stack de recrutamento, simplificado.

Produtos

  • Sourcing de Candidatos
  • Enrich
  • CRM
  • Portal do cliente
  • Preços
  • Descarregar Aplicação Desktop

Soluções

  • Executive Search
  • Agências de Recrutamento
  • ATS for In-House Teams
  • Recrutamento Interno

Casos de uso

  • ATS para pequenas agências
  • ATS para executive search

Recursos

  • Comparações
  • Centro de Ajuda
  • Blog
  • Guia de Melhores Práticas
  • Guia RGPD
  • GDPR Compliance Checklist
  • Guia ATS com CRM
  • ATS Cost Guide
  • LinkedIn Recruiter vs ATS
  • Retained vs Contingent Search
  • How to Start a Recruiting Agency
  • Recruiting Software Stack Guide
  • Best Cities for Executive Search

Ferramentas Gratuitas

  • Calculadora ROI do ATS
  • Diagnóstico de Ops de Recrutamento
  • Parser de CV com IA Gratuito
  • Reformatador de CV com IA Gratuito
  • Kit de Ferramentas de Recrutamento

Empresa

  • Sobre Nós
  • Contacto
  • Carreiras
  • Política de Privacidade
  • Termos de Serviço
  • Security
  • Data Processing Agreement
  • Cookie Policy

Comparar a Yena

vs Bullhorn·vs Greenhouse·vs Personio·vs Lever·vs Workable·vs SmartRecruiters·vs BambooHR·vs Vincere·vs Loxo·vs Manatal·vs iCIMS·vs Teamtailor·vs Recruit CRM·vs SAP SuccessFactors·vs JobAdder·vs Ashby·vs JazzHR·vs Recruitee·vs Softgarden·vs Crelate·vs Zoho Recruit·vs Traffit·vs Firefish·vs Recruiterflow·vs Recrur·vs Staffin·vs Teamdash
Riga, Letónia | Mazā Nometņu iela 31, LV-1002
[email protected]
© 2026 SIA "New Tech".
Y
L
Platform Comparison 2026

Yena vs Loxo — autonomous vs
manual LinkedIn extraction.

Loxo requires manually clicking 'Contact Info' on every LinkedIn profile. Yena's AI autonomously navigates and extracts verified emails for 1st-degree connections—plus semantic matching built-in, not bolted-on.

Contact Extraction
Yena: Autonomous (no clicking)
Loxo: Manual clicking required
AI Architecture
Yena: Native (Gemini)
Loxo: Bolted-on
Pricing
Yena: €3K-€20K/year
Loxo: Contact sales
Book 30-min DemoRead Loxo alternative guide →

Why we're credible to write this

Loxo is a US-based recruiting CRM with LinkedIn extraction features. Yena is AI-native from the ground up. Loxo wins on established brand and large customer base (4.6/5, 444 G2 reviews). Yena wins on autonomous contact extraction (no manual clicking required), AI-native architecture (not bolted-on), semantic matching (25-40% accuracy improvement), Shadow DOM resilience (never breaks when LinkedIn updates), and transparent pricing (€3K-€20K/year published).

Why recruiters switch from Loxo.

01

Autonomous Contact Extraction

Zero manual clicking required. Yena's extension invisibly navigates to the 'Contact Info' modal on every LinkedIn profile and extracts verified emails and phone numbers for all 1st-degree connections.

02

AI-Native Architecture

Loxo bolted AI on top of a traditional CRM. Yena was built AI-first—every import runs through Google Gemini from day one, delivering 25-40% better matching accuracy than manual Boolean searches.

03

Transparent Annual Pricing

Loxo charges per user per month—costs balloon as your team grows. Yena's flat annual pricing (€3K-€20K/year) is publicly listed on the website. No 'contact sales' surprises.

Feature-by-feature comparison.

CharacteristicYenaLoxo
Primary ArchitectureAI-native from day one: every import runs through Google GeminiTraditional CRM with AI features bolted on
Contact Info Extraction AutonomousExtension invisibly navigates to 'Contact Info' modal, extracts email/phone automatically—ZERO manual clickingManualYOU must manually click 'Contact Info' modal on every profile to extract data
Clicks Per Candidate 1 clickClick Yena extension button → AI handles everything3-4 clicksClick extension → click 'Contact Info' → click 'See more' → wait
Time to Add One Candidate 15 secondsOne click → AI extracts profile + contact info → done30-60 secondsMultiple clicks + waiting for modal navigation
Weekly Time Saved 7-10 hoursPer recruiter: autonomous extraction + AI matching eliminates manual work3-5 hoursStill requires manual clicking on every profile
AI Candidate Matching NativeGemini reads CV → semantic scoring → ranks by fit (25-40% better accuracy)Bolted-OnAI features added as optional modules, not core architecture
Shadow DOM Resilience ✓Extension uses Shadow DOM: never breaks when LinkedIn updates CSS⚠XPath selectors can break when LinkedIn updates (reported user issues)
Data Enrichment AI-PoweredEvery profile runs through Gemini: auto-standardizes dates, skills, experience, detects duplicatesBasicData enrichment via third-party integrations
Setup Time 24 hoursCloud-native: sign up → install extension → import candidates → recruit1-2 weeksImplementation, training, integration setup
Pricing Model Annual Flat€3K-€20K/year based on team size (transparent, published)Per-User MonthlyContact sales (~$119-179/user/month estimated)
Pricing for 10-Person Team €7K-€12K/year~€700-1,200/month total$14K-21K/year~$1,190-1,790/month total
Best For3-50 consultants wanting autonomous extraction + AI-native matchingUS staffing agencies comfortable with manual clicking + per-user pricing
G2 RatingNew platform (launching Q1 2025)4.6/5 (444 reviews)

Who usually chooses what?

L

Loxo is chosen by…

  • US-based staffing agencies familiar with Loxo brand
  • Teams willing to manually click 'Contact Info' on every LinkedIn profile
  • Organizations accepting AI features as add-ons (not native)
  • Agencies with budget for per-user pricing (~$119-179/user/month)
Y

Yena is chosen by…

  • Executive search consultants tired of manually clicking 'Contact Info' 100+ times daily
  • Recruiters wanting AI to autonomously extract contact info (no manual clicking)
  • Teams wanting AI-native architecture (not bolted-on features)
  • Agencies wanting transparent annual pricing (€3K-€20K/year) without per-user fees

When to choose each platform.

Choose Yena if…
  • You're tired of manually clicking 'Contact Info' on 50-100 LinkedIn profiles daily
  • You want autonomous contact extraction (AI handles navigation, no manual clicking)
  • You want AI-native architecture (not bolted-on features)
  • You want semantic matching (25-40% accuracy improvement)
  • You need Shadow DOM resilience (extension never breaks when LinkedIn updates)
  • You want transparent annual pricing (€3K-€20K/year) with no per-user fees
Choose Loxo if…
  • You're a US-based staffing agency already using Loxo
  • Manual clicking 'Contact Info' on every profile is acceptable
  • AI features as add-ons (not native) meet your needs
  • Per-user monthly pricing (~$119-179/user/month) fits your budget
  • Established brand and large customer base are important

Frequently asked questions

Both platforms have LinkedIn Chrome extensions, but with a key difference: Loxo requires you to manually click 'Contact Info' on every LinkedIn profile to extract emails. Yena's AI autonomously navigates to the Contact Info modal and extracts verified emails/phone numbers for 1st-degree connections—zero manual clicking required.

Loxo started as a traditional CRM and added AI features over time. Yena is AI-native from day one—every candidate import runs through Google Gemini for extraction, enrichment, and semantic matching.

Yena uses Shadow DOM technology that encapsulates our extension styles separately from LinkedIn's page. This means when LinkedIn updates their CSS (which happens frequently), Yena never breaks. Loxo uses XPath selectors that can break when LinkedIn changes their DOM structure.

Loxo uses per-user monthly pricing (~$119-179/user/month, contact sales for exact quotes). Yena uses transparent annual pricing (€3K-€20K/year) published on our website—no per-user fees means cost stays predictable as teams grow.

Manually clicking 'Contact Info' on 50 LinkedIn profiles takes ~25-30 minutes daily. With Yena's autonomous extraction, that time drops to zero—the AI handles everything. That's 7-10 hours saved weekly per recruiter compared to 3-5 hours with Loxo.

Related comparisons

AI
Yena vs Vincere

AI-native vs manual workflows

Staffing
Yena vs Bullhorn

Compare for staffing agencies

Enterprise
Yena vs SmartRecruiters

AI-native vs enterprise platform